Search: Web        
powered by

Archive for June, 2006

Mesa’s debt payments save millions

June 21st, 2006, 5:12 pm by Sharon

The Mesa City Council voted recently to restructure some of the city’s debt payments which amount to millions over the life of bonds. I call this responsible government.Refinancing city bonds will actually level off the debt by adjusting payment periods or by getting better interest rates. According to Bryan Raines, Mesa’s financial service manager, restructuring some of the Mesa’s debt payments will save well over $1 million and level off the debt.Furthermore, according to city documents almost $2.7 million will be realized over the life of the bonds as reported by Sarah Lynch, East Valley Tribune.How can Mesan’s accuse city government of wasting money when the budget office is diligently looking for ways to find sources that will save money? Keep up the good work in looking for saving measures such as this and for keeping the community well informed of the relevant information that will hopefully dispel the notion of mistrust.

Mesa never satisfied

June 21st, 2006, 6:03 am by Sharon

The Tribune editorial of June 13 carried a lot of truth on "Mesa’s budget grows along with city" along with Bryan Raines, Mesa’s Financial Manager’s commentary "Explaining increase in Mesa budget".The city in my opinion went all out to include citizens in the discussions surrounding Mesa’s dire circumstances and the reality of shortfalls that we as a community would face without a primary property tax that would help tremendously toward a better budget funded but not quite out of the "woods". Not many showed up at those meetings held in every district in the city, which is six. There was ample opportunity over many weeks to have your say, learn the facts, an opportunity to turn in your own "wish" list of what you would like to see funded. Pretty good way to educate Mesa’s citizenry.Even with the many times available people didn’t show up. The majority that voted down the property tax seems to me didn’t want to hear the truth. Why? It might bring home a conviction to actually pass the tax because we need it. From where I sit it seems more a point of pride in trying to get along without the tax with a false rhetoric that we as a city don’t need the tax, keep the money for ourselves and let others pay for services that are now cut. Cut from our very own lists of priorities perhaps believing it won’t happen.What I don’t understand is why the finger is always pointed at the current council - oh, but what a minute - if the finger is pointed to the council it takes the heat off those that cannot accept the responsibility of not measuring up to funding a city that is what it is because of the growth and providing the important things that make our city great and what people, family, and business’ look for when buying into a community.The council has done an extraodinary job along with city staff in spending wisely, providing programs, drawing attention across our nation that bring recognition to Mesa through awards for excellent work worthy of citizens applause not discouraging remarks. As Bryan Raines points out the new financial reporting requirements cause a redundancy in dollars that amount to $43 million of the $120 million increase in Mesa’s budget. Another ongoing expense will be salaries. Why there are those that don’t realize that city employees are not slaves of government and deserve salary increases including pension increases required by the state, is unimaginable. Bryan also tells us financial stability and improving Mesa’s bond rating includes setting aside funds for future debt payments. Mesa’s budget and shortfalls will continue to have a need to be addressed. I do agree with Bryan’s view and trust his first hand knowledge that the city exercises sound fiscal management polices and appropriate accountability of public resources. He spoke several times during the district budget meetings and may have made a difference to you had you been there to hear all that we as a city face.To make up for some of the funds needed we most likely will see increased fees, increased utility rates, and some of the services you may have thought would not be touched like seniors using dial-a-ride - which the city has graciously sponsored - it now may be used only for the disabled as intended but not without other means that are in place to get a ride, we just have to learn to use them. I don’t think we’ve gained anything by voting down the primary property tax because we’ll pay in other ways; it’s only taken away many of those services taken for granted and from those typically compromised, those that need assistance, programs that are valuable for families, city employees that have protected us in our parks and schools - and as we grow that $1 Billion city budget is just over the horizon. The explaination that many can’t afford a primary property tax doesn’t hold water, especially since the Governor has come up with tax breaks for the coming year.

Fringe Dwellers

June 19th, 2006, 1:48 pm by elburton

Since I began writing this Blog I have attempted to walk a fine line between bitter partisanship and a hippie view of flower power love. I have come to realize that we are all so different that we will never see eye to eye on every issue in this country or this city for that matter. I have learned that the first key to progress is that we find common ground and realize that we have to just agree to disagree on many subjects while tempering those disagreements with respect.Over the weekend I read a piece in the Tribune written by Sam Coppersmith a Democratic party activist and former member of the U.S. House and I realized that my utopian view of both parties getting along and respecting one another for their views is the equivalent of a drug induced pipe dream. Mr. Coppersmith in his bitter partisan attack showed the true colors of the radical left. He showed that they have no interest in working together rather a stated position and attitude that everything is the fault of the right, they control everything so therefore they are to blame for anything. Now I am no Pollyanna, I realize that where you have elements of the radical left fringe you will also find elements of the radical right. The key is that we keep both in exactly the same place they are right now, relegated to the outer fringe sucking the life out of their fellow fringe dwellers. Mr. Coppersmith attacked with reckless abandon the right wing of our political system lumping them all into one ball. He used obscure examples as a template to show the conflict in the conservative movement using issues that even as a nation we will all never agree as some sort of litmus test for the truth. He fails to see his radical ideology for what it is… a partisan effort to co-opt everyone into his world, his way of thinking because he knows better than we do what is good for us. I have said it before and I will say it again, anyone who stands before you and tells you that they know the truth, that they have all the answers and that their way is the only true and enlightened way is full of, well you know what I mean. Here is the truth, we are all never going to agree on everything, what we can agree on is that our goal should be to enhance those areas where we agree, make them better while at the same time attempting to bridge the gap where we don’t agree. People like Sam Coppersmith and members of the radical left and radical right have an agenda that would widen the chasm between people, further divide them into armies who serve an unholy master bent on maintaining control through fear tactics. Republicans will no more destroy this country than Democrats; however, the radical fringes of both these parties will continue to attempt to unite armies to wage battle for the control. It is up to those of us who find ourselves caught in the middle to stand up and defend this democracy because if you haven’t noticed we are at war within our own borders and the armies of the radical right and the radical left are gearing up for the final assault that will determine who controls your destiny. These fringe dwelling mental midgets who masquerade as leaders and spokesmen are a threat, don’t buy into the hype and hysteria they are peddling.

Chicken Little

June 16th, 2006, 11:07 am by elburton

The older I get the more I have learned about life and the more I have learned how to say that I am sorry and I may have been wrong. Information is key in the decision making process and too much information is never a bad thing. Here in Mesa we have just gone through a rough patch where residents were pitted one against the other as the city fought over an ever inflating budget, a proposed property tax and what the city council has portrayed as dwindling revenue in the face of massive expenditures. The city council has claimed that they have cut every conceivable expense from the budget and the only answer to rising costs was the need to implement a property tax. This is where I have to step in and state that I may have been wrong. I supported the property tax, armed with what I thought were facts I wandered out into the world and attempted to sway voters into voting "Yes", that this city was in desperate need of increasing revenue to shore up some of the essential services that were threatened. It has come to my attention that one area the city council didn’t cut was one of their precious little perks, car allowances for the political elite. To the tune of over $200,000 a year they have kept that little benefit while wailing in public about the cutbacks that will have to be made in services and staff. What else have they failed to cut? How many of you get a car allowance for your job? Tough times require a sacrifice for all, with gas prices at an all time high and with no end in sight to the pain at the pump we are all experiencing why are the politically elite among us getting a break while we have to budget in our lives to compensate? Which essential services and staff members could have been saved if only those who were connected stepped up and sacrificed what amounts to a bonus for them? The lesson I have learned here is that politicians today are like "Chicken Little" from the children’s book, they run around screaming about the sky falling. I have said it before and I will say it again, government at any level is not a money making body, they are a money taking entity and it is up top all of us to make sure they don’t take it all.

Garcia resigns from the City of Mesa

June 14th, 2006, 11:29 pm by Sharon

Lisha Garcia resigned today from her position as Manager, Deparment of Neighborhood Services for the City of Mesa. There have been other opportunities come her way she wants to explore.Lisha has seen several successful accomplishments by the department the last two years and complimented the Division Directors of Neighborhood Services for their excellent work. Ms. Garcia stated "I leave the department with good leadership, a strategic plan for moving forward and a successful transition to Activity Based Budgeting." I’m certain her service to the City of Mesa served us well and provided a purpose through her dedication to the community; and as Deputy City Manager Paul Wenbert commented, "I appreciated Lisha’s commitment and passion to providing the best possible services in a time of reduced federal and local resources".There are many good people working in the City of Mesa and I hope in particular that the Department of Neighborhood Services has a time of renewal for everyone concerned. It was also a great loss when Debbie Driscoll resigned as she too was appreciated by so many.My thoughts and prayers are with each one and with the city - as a whole new season is approaching within our neighborhoods, may it bring about a refreshing time of victory in our new budget year.

Tolerance Is A Tricky Proposition

June 14th, 2006, 1:11 pm by elburton

Tolerance is defined in the dictionary as follows: 1- The capacity for respecting the beliefs or practices of others. 2- Leeway for variations from a standard. Tolerance is a word I have been hearing a lot lately. It is a word that has religious, philosophical and political implications. Tolerance is a wonderful word, it is a wonderful concept. Unfortunately, it is a concept that is being abused. We are being asked on a regular basis to embrace tolerance, but what are we being asked to be tolerant of? I am not going to point the finger here and say that I am speaking of this issue or that issue. I am going to suggest that before you embrace something, ask yourself if this is really something that we need to embrace as a society. The second definition of the word is a "leeway for variations of a standard." So we have established that we do have standards from which we work. My contention is that we are forever changing the standard, therefore as a society we are forced to tolerate more and more. I suspect that there is an ever decaying ring around that which protects society. I know that in the name of tolerance we have come a long way. We have seen civil rights rise from the ashes of a dream to become a reality. We have moved from the dark ages of aggression to an era of spreading liberty and freedom to people around the world. However, it is imperative that as a society we don’t tolerate too much and as a society I fear that is exactly where we are. Ask yourself if you are comfortable raising your children today? Do you like what your children see daily? Do you like what they are taught in public schools? Do you like the information that is out there at the tips of their precious fingers? Are the stories of teachers having sex with their students comforting to you? Do you like the examples being set by some of the corporate executives that are on trial for embezzling money? Do you like the great political divide that has occurred in this country and the vitriolic language that is being used between the parties? Do you like what the courts in this country have become? You see tolerance is what got us where we are. Good and bad, tolerance has delivered us to this time in history. The danger is that if we begin to tolerate anything eventually we will tolerate everything. Tolerance must be tempered with a societal common standard while protecting individual freedoms. Pretty tricky stuff isn’t it? So the next time you hear someone preaching tolerance ask yourself, where is this tolerance going to lead us?

Contest benefits Children’s Dental Clinic-Participate

June 12th, 2006, 4:14 pm by

Businesses and private citizens encouraged to participate to benefit the Valley

Phoenix basketball star becomes a doctor

June 12th, 2006, 4:14 pm by

Becoming a doctor was not at the top of Sonny Huitron

Mesa’s influence on Governor’s Council on Aging

June 12th, 2006, 4:08 pm by

MESA, Arizona

Ax To Grind

June 12th, 2006, 2:24 pm by elburton

We laugh at Jeff Foxworthy and his "You know you are a redneck if" routine, we roll on the ground listening to Chris Rock curse un-mercifully and use the "N" word with reckless abandon as he pokes fun at his race and others, and the new comedy hit on Comedy Central is the Mind of Mencia where we bust a gut laughing as Carlos Mencia does bit after bit on Latin Americans but hell hath no furry like a city manager who has an ax to grind when it comes to police officers swapping what he terms as "racially insensitive" emails.With the revelation that city employees and police officers are facing huge suspensions I want to focus on the racial component of this investigation. I realize that there are other factors but as I read the Tribune articles on the subject I found the comments of Bill Strauss who is the head of the Arizona chapter of the Anti-Defamation league to be interesting, "Fueling that with racial jokes and messages that promote racial and ethnic stereotyping could be dangerous," he said, continuing he stated, "It actually could compel somebody to cross the line legally." Mr. Strauss and I disagree a bit on this one; I do think that sexually explicit emails are a bit worse and more disconcerting than jokes.I will say that I honestly don’t believe that work email should be used for non-work issues but I think that when we have crazy people like Bill Strauss running around saying that jokes could cause people to cross some imaginary legal line is like saying that if you eat watermelon seeds you run the risk of growing an actual watermelon in your stomach, it simply isn’t reality. Are there racists among us? Sure there is but this wholesale scare tactics isn’t the answer either. If you want to battle something learn to laugh about it, why do you think that all the comics I referenced above have made it so big, I can assure you that it isn’t because they are labeled racists, it is because they have learned how to find humor in everything. Live a little, learn to laugh at yourself, your race, your quirks and your malfunctions just don’t share it on your work email account… Here is a joke for Mr. Strauss, how many members of the Anti-defamation league does it take to screw in a light bulb? None because they just sit around and wait for someone else to change it so they can call them racists, I never said I was a comedian…

ADVERTISEMENT